- From: Jun Fujisawa <fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:33:39 +0900
- To: Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
- Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Hi Pete, At 4:26 AM -0700 04.7.21, Pete Wenzel wrote: >Jun, you raised Issue #499 in this email: ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2004Jul/0010.html>, >in which you suggested that Section 2.2.4 of the SOAP Resource >Representation Header Last Call specification describe the value of >rep:Data as "a base64 encoded representation in the canonical lexical >form". > >During its July 14 meeting, the XMLP WG decided that it was >unnecessary to say that the lexical form must be the canonical form, >because this header is independent of MTOM. So this will not result >in any change to the Representation Header specification. I'm happy with this resolution. -- Jun Fujisawa <mailto:fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:41:26 UTC