xmlp-comments@w3.org from November 2002 by date

Wednesday, 27 November 2002

• XMLP Resolution of QA Issues 367, 368, 369 David Fallside

Wednesday, 20 November 2002

• XMLP Issue 355 closed Martin Gudgin
• RE: XMLP Issue 262 closed Martin Gudgin
• XMLP Issue 262 closed Martin Gudgin

Friday, 15 November 2002

• RE: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? Jeffrey Schlimmer

Thursday, 14 November 2002

• RE: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 11 November 2002

• Comments on SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature Amelia A. Lewis

Thursday, 7 November 2002

• RE: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• FW: Editorial question regarding the naming of "Web Method Specification Feature" in part 2 section 6.4 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Wednesday, 6 November 2002

• FW: Proposal for editorial clarification in part 2, section 4.2.2 RPC Response Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Resolution of Issue 391 Volker Wiechers

Monday, 4 November 2002

• Issue 387 resolution Herve Ruellan
• Issue 386 resolution Herve Ruellan
• Closing Issue 277 Herve Ruellan

Friday, 1 November 2002

• RE: resolution to URI equivalence rules issue (XMLP issue 388) Kirill Gavrylyuk
• resolution to URI equivalence rules issue (XMLP issue 388) Mark Jones
• resolution of concrete attachment issue (XMLP issue 393) Mark Jones
• Closing XML Protocol Last Call issue 300: How is version transition handled in the HTTP binding? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Last message date: Tuesday, 26 November 2002 20:16:51 UTC