- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:59:33 -0800
- To: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org>
The WG decided to accept this proposal. Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com -----Original Message----- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 14:27 To: xml-dist-app@w3.org Cc: fallside@us.ibm.com Subject: Proposal for editorial clarification in part 2, section 4.2.2 RPC Response As a minor editorial comment, in part of part 2, section 4.2.2 [1], the last sentence says "An RPC response MUST NOT contain both a result and a fault, because a result indicates success and a fault indicates failure." This seems to be a leftover from old days: Given the description of faults as part of the general SOAP model [2], it is impossible to have the case that a SOAP message can contain a fault and a non-fault body at the same time. As a result, this MUST requirement seems to be at best redundant with the general SOAP rules. I propose to simply delete the sentence. Are there any objections to this? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#rpcresponse [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part1.xml#procsoapmsgs
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 15:00:04 UTC