- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:15:48 -0500
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: Dear XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
I am in agreement with the general direction signaled by this proposed resolution, but I think some of the details need clarification. Specifically, I think this question potentially arises both with respect to the envelope infoset, and with respect to XML serializations that might be sent by one or another binding. The two are not completely independent, but I think that both need to be covered. Specifically, I think that in the HTTP binding we need to describe any rules regarding the appearance of the XML declaration( <?xml version=" " ?> in the HTTP entity body of messages prepared for transmission. Would the correct rule be "MAY be sent, MUST be accepted"? In the interest of moving forward, I would find it acceptable for you to close this issue immediately, and leave to the discretion of the editors the work needed to actually clarify the various parts of the specification. Thank you very much. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr> 03/22/2002 04:01 AM To: Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> cc: Dear XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> Subject: Issue 189: closed Noah, You raised an issue about what XML version number SOAP should specify [1]. The WG will close this issue with the following resolution: <resolution> Enchance the description of the Envelope encoding to include discussion stating that the values of the [version], [character encoding scheme] and [standalone] infoset properties are unimportant as far as SOAP is concerned. </resolution> Please respond to this message, cc'eing xmlp-comments, if you think this is an unacceptable resolution. Thanks, Jean-Jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x189
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 14:31:02 UTC