- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:01:09 -0500
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
I believe your note accurately reflects the decision reached by the workgroup, and I hereby confirm my willingness to have the issue closed based on the resolution that you propose. However, I would like the workgroup to take note of a couple of lingering concerns, so that we may be alert to their consequences moving forward. 1) Some of the proposed text prefers explicitly to the "DTDNotSupported" fault. I believe that resolution of issue 191 will result in such references being removed. 2) Although I am not trying to reopen a compromise decision to which we have agreed, I would like to signal again my concern about the rewriting of role attributes and mustUnderstand attributes. While there are good performance reasons for allowing such rewrites, I fear that they will significantly complicate the implementation of certain sorts of digital signatures. Again, in spite of these concerns, I'm willing to have the issue closed as you suggest. Thank you very much. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com> Sent by: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org 03/22/2002 11:55 AM To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org> Subject: Issue #176 closed Noah, As the creator of issue 176 [1] against the SOAP 1.2 specification, I can inform you that the XML Protocol WG [0] has decided to close the issue with the resolution described below. If this is not acceptable to you then please respond to this mail with a detailed description of your concerns and preferably what you see not being addressed as part of the resolution. RESOLUTION ---------- The text outlined in [2] was adopted as the resolution text to the issue with proposed modifications by yourself [3] and taking into account the accepted resolution to issue 137 [4]. It should be noted that the mail proposed resolution went through considerable discussion [5] and was discussed at the Feb 2002 WG f2f (to be posted). At the f2f, the WG instructed the editors to exercise some amount of editorial discretion in order to avoid duplication or requirements and description of the SOAP message construct in general. Thank you, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com [0] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/ [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x176 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0183.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0193.html [4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x137 [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/thread.html#183
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 14:17:50 UTC