- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:11:47 +0200 (CEST)
- To: XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
- cc: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Hello all, 8-)
the WG has decided to simplify the SOAP Encoding section of
Adjuncts by removing the distinction between locally and globally
scoped identifiers, because the distinction is already present in
the type of the identifiers - QName.
The necessary action is to remove the distinction from section
3.1 and 3.1.3.
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:50:33 -0400
From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: RE: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped
> label is a QName, end of story
+ 1
Asir
-----Original Message-----
From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:28 PM
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped
The issue about us keeping the distinction between locally and
globally scoped labels has also been commented on by me in [1]
and Martin Gudgin replied in [2]:
"We do use the distinction in 3.1.3. I guess we Could just say
the label is a QName, end of story."
Let me propose that we go exactly this path - just making a
label a qname, and removing the appropriate part of section 3.1.3
which won't be needed then. I'd leave the appropriate changes to
the editors.
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0137.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0198.html
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 16:11:49 UTC