- From: <xml-names-editor@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Malachi de AElfweald <malachi@tremerechantry.com>
- Cc: xml-names-editor@w3.org
This is the XML Core Working Group's formal response to your comment sent to the Namespaces comment list. We have treated it as a comment on the Namespaces 1.1 draft even though you did not originally send it as such. Your comment is archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2003Feb/0005.html Please let us know whether you accept our resolution of our comment, or wish to have an objection formally recorded. If we do not hear from you within 10 days we will assume that you accept our response. We have reconsidered the terminology used for names that are in no namespace. To avoid confusion over the word "null", and the incorrect inference that there is a "null namespace", we will say that the namespace name of a name in no namespace "has no value". This has the additional advantage of bringing Namespaces 1.1 into line with the terminology used in the Infoset spec.
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 14:23:09 UTC