- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:46:17 -0500
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
On Thursday 14 March 2002 13:16, merlin wrote: > I would change the parenthesis to: > > (Including the plaintext decryption key, whether a private key or > a secret key, is obviously NOT RECOMMENDED.) Ok. > X/Y/Z can't really be expressed for a general environment. It might be > possible to say that performance should be, broadly speaking, linear in > document size (taking into consideration cache and memory constraints), > and within a reasonable constant of performing the relevant operation > (e.g., XML parsing) on the plaintext data. Yes... well I suppose I'll leave it there and implementors can be abstract, "Yes, I find the specification capable of being use to create an implementation with satisfactory performance..." But any more specificity I can get, I welcome. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 13:46:19 UTC