W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Decryption Transform processing question

From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:04:21 +0900
To: reagle@w3.org
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF037C680E.2171E575-ON49256BD4.004098D0@LocalDomain>


>> I don't think that using an explicit Type attribute value is a good
>> proposal.  It is not an encryptor but a signer that decides whether an
>> EncryptedData element should be decrypted.
>Instead of a type, how about a specific parameter (e.g., &decrypt;#super)

Who specifies the parameter and where does he/she specify it?

>(BTW: Do you accept the proposal that we support &decypt;bnary and

If we don't support super-decryption, I accept the proposal.

Tokyo Research Laboratory
IBM Research
Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 08:04:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:09 UTC