- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:14:13 +0900
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org, ietf-types@iana.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, XML Encryption <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 15:00 02/08/08 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote: >As Ned and Martin point out, the intent is to express the fact that >"application/xenc+xml" is XML, and consequently shares the same charset and >encoding semantics/processing as that defined in RFC 3023. Well, what the spec currently writes is okay, but what you just write above is not: The intent is to say that application/xenc+xml shares the same charset behaviour as application/xml defined in RFC 3023. (text/xml behaves differently) Regards, Martin.
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 23:42:11 UTC