Re: What do we do with our CMS References?

BTW, the link to "CMS-Algorithms" in "Reference" section of
the "XML Encryption Syntax and Processing" is broken. The version
number was changed and now it should be
     http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-cmsalg-08.txt
instead of
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-cmsalg-07.txt

Aleksey.


Joseph Reagle wrote:

>On Monday 29 April 2002 09:03, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
>
>>Yes, we should make it clear, either in the text or in our references
>>section, that we are using a snapshot. If they haven't issued as RFCs
>>we should just reference these draft as works in progress but we can
>>give authors, title, and date if we want.
>>
>
>Ok, I make a few tweaks to show we are "adopting" the text (so our text is 
>normative for our spec) and state "(These specifications are still works in 
>progress so we include those parts of their present specification within 
>this document where necessary.)"
>