- From: Ari Kermaier <arik@phaos.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:59:00 -0400
- To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
At 04:24 PM 4/26/02 +0900, Takeshi Imamura wrote: <snip/> >By the way, as to decryptXML(), it may be necessary to exchange step 2 and >3 because an octet stream obtained in step 1 may not contain any namespace >declaration attribute necessary for parsing the octet stream when >decrypting an EncrypteData element within the octet stream. How do you >feel? I'm not sure I understand. Isn't the parsing context C that would be used in step 3 itself derived entirely from node-set X? If that's the case, what's an example of a namespace declaration that would be in C but would not be preserved by applying XML-C14N to X? Ari Kermaier arik@phaos.com Senior Software Engineer Phaos Technology Corp. http://www.phaos.com/
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 11:56:32 UTC