- From: jiandong guo <jguo@phaos.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:41:23 -0700
- To: <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <xml-encryption@w3.org>, <reagle@w3c.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 22:58:11 UTC
I believe that what we agreed before is to fix SHA-1 for using with MGF. The reason that the same hash function is suggested to be used in RSASSA-PSS signature scheme is to against the weak-hash fuction substitute attack where the attacker could forge a new signature from the given signature by using a weak hash function acceptable by the verifier in MGF. This attack can also be addressed by fixing a strong hash function (e.g. SHA-1) for use. In any case, RSA-OAEP is an encryption scheme so this type of attack doesn't make sense here. Jiandong Guo Phaos Technology
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 22:58:11 UTC