Draft Minutes Available for Comment, Question, and Correction

Thanks to everyone involved for the very productive meeting! (I guess you 
can tell how productive it is by the number of action items! <grin/>) 
Special thanks to Blair, Ed, and Hiroshi for the presentations; and Donald, 
Eric, and Frederick for their minutes!


[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Meetings/0301-Boston/minutes.html
Boston, MA. 01 March 2000

   Resulting Action Items:

     1. Reagle: reflect discussions in minutes in Requirements Document.
     2. Reagle and Dillaway: reflect discussion in a new specification
        draft including schema structures, EncryptedKey as child of
        KeyInfo, and adding a "hint" attribute for when there's multiple
        recipients.
     3. Eastlake: draft a more complete algorithm section include
        algorithm profiles and IV checksum cipher text values.
     4. Maruyama: update the Encryption/Signature Transform. Update
        Security Considerations, add a scenario or two (and maybe borrow
        "enc:DataRef" instead of using "EncryptedReference").
     5. Maruyama: an email exploring the question of our processing model
        and the relationship between DOM, Infoset, and serialization and
        the issue related to using current parsers to get a pointer to a
        byte where element starting "<" is.
     6. Reagle: "Review the use of a URI versus an ID and NameKey in an
        EncryptedKey element?"
     7. Reagle: Write an email describing options with respect to reuse of
        dsig KeyInfo.
     8. Reagle: Inform Don Davis of new requirements document when
        complete and that issue 6.2 was dropped.


__
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2001 17:30:52 UTC