- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:47:51 -0400
- To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Cc: edsimon@xmlsec.com, XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>, Blair Dillaway <blaird@microsoft.com>
At 10:27 7/31/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote: > >When doing a replace on decrypt, same thing, octets or nodes? > >I think that when doing a replacement, something may be returned for >application's convenience, e.g., as a DOM node, but it does not have to be >required. So we should say "... if the Type is "Element" or "Content", then: 1. provide the octets, or 2. provide the nodeset, or 3. replace " ? >Do you mean that both are required to implement and whether doing a >replacement or not depends on application's choice? If so, I agree with >you. Yes, I mean whatever set of options we come up, they should all be required to implement. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 16:48:00 UTC