- From: Toth, Daniel (D.L.) <dtoth3@ford.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 16:16:46 -0400
- To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>, XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>
How about a report out/action items from XKMS Workshop? -DanT Daniel Toth -- dtoth3@ford.com Senior Integration Architect, Ford Motor Co. Application Integration Technology 15575 Lundy Pkwy - W2E201 Desk:(313)322-9103 FAX:(313)621-8392 > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. [mailto:reagle@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:19 PM > To: XML Encryption WG > Subject: Draft Agenda for July 20th > > > http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Minutes/0720-Redwood/agenda.html > > If I'm missing something, please let me know! > __ > > DRAFT PROGRAM > > The goal of this meeting is to prepare for last call by closing any > issues and then revisiting our expectations regarding an > implementation > schedule and specification advancement. Please be familiar with the > current deliverables of the Working Group. > > Volunteers form are solicited: 3 note takers for 2 hour chunks. > > Friday 20 July > > 8.30 - 9.00 Continental Breakfast > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 9.00 - 9.50 (45m): > > 1. Introductions / History / Agenda Bashing. Joseph Reagle. > > 9.50 - 10.30 (50m): Issues I > > * Quick review of some of the easier outstanding issues > > Proposal: Dropping the Type algorithm for a given key. (20m) > > Proposal: Nonce attribute. (15m) > > Proposal: Requirement to Warn of Surreptitious Forwarding (15m) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 10.30 - 10.45 break > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 10.45 - 12.30 (105m): Issues II > > 1. Report: Implementation Experience, Takeshi Imamura (30m) > 2. Discussion: Processing Rules for XML Data, Ed Simon (30m) > 3. Proposal: ? DigestMethod/DigestValue, Jim Schaad? (15m) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 12.30 - 1.30 lunch (60m) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 1.30 - 3.15 Issues III > > * Review: Algorithms and Compliance Requirements, Don > Eastlake (30m) > * Discussion: Refocus on Difficult Issues (45m) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 3.15 - 3.30 Break (15m) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 3.30 - 4.00 Open Issue Resolution > > * Propose methods of resolving issues not completed (action items > to document alternatives, make new proposal, discuss in > teleconference, ask for wider review, etc.) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 4.00 - 5.00 Logistics > > * Review Charter, Milestones, and Schedule (30m), Propose Update: > > August > Requirements Last Call > XML Encryption Last Call > October 2001 > XML Encryption Candidate REC > January 2002 > XML Encryption Proposed REC > > > * When to have teleconferences, when to meet next? (30m) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org> Last updated: 19th September 2000. > > -- > Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ > W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org > IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature > W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/ >
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 16:17:25 UTC