- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:47:18 -0400
- To: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
I'm going to cancel the call on Monday given we don't have that much to discuss. That's not to say there's nothing to discuss, but these issues merit some more discussion on the list before we need to discuss them on a teleconf I think -- and their fairly minor to boot. In other news our WD was published and I'm agitating others to review the spec by July 13th so we have question/comments/issues to address at the FTF then move through a formal call very quickly. Then the task is implementation experience -- particular on the decrypt transform! However, one of the rules of this process seems folks don't review your spec until it's too late <grin/>, so if you know of some constituency that should have a look, please ask them to look at the spec! (I've asked most of the relevant W3C WGs and the Oasis SS TC (SAML)). Proposal: Dropping the Type algorithm for a given key. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Jul/0009.html Proposal: Nonce attribute. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Jul/0004.html Requirement to Warn of Surreptitious Forwarding http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Jun/0100.html -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 18:47:19 UTC