- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:45:09 -0500
- To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
On Friday 21 December 2001 05:28, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > in the References section of [1] I saw that the RIPEMD-160 description > was at RSA? > > RIPEMD-160 > CryptoBytes, Volume 3, Number 2. The Cryptographic Hash Function > RIPEMD-160. RSA Laboratories. Autumn 1997. > ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/cryptobytes/crypto3n2.pdf > > I think that the normative spec for this should be The Cryptobytes is the latest version of their paper. In terms of a normative spec, from the bibliography you can see its part of ISO/IEC 10118-3:1998, but I prefer not to cite things I can't read. Regardless, I've added the link that they authors maintain in the spirit of Don's email on redundancy. http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~cosicart/pdf/AB-9601/AB-9601.pdf -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 13:47:49 UTC