- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:00:27 -0500
- To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Given the way URLs go bad with time, I'd be inclined to include both references. Thanks, Donald From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:28:22 +0100 To: reagle@w3.org Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org Message-id: <3911755209.1008934102@localhost> >Hi Joseph, > >in the References section of [1] I saw that the RIPEMD-160 description was >at RSA? > >RIPEMD-160 >CryptoBytes, Volume 3, Number 2. The Cryptographic Hash Function >RIPEMD-160. RSA Laboratories. Autumn 1997. >ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/cryptobytes/crypto3n2.pdf > >I think that the normative spec for this should be > >RIPEMD-160: >A Strengthened Version of RIPEMD >Hans Dobbertin, Antoon Bosselaers, Bart Preneel, >April 1996 >http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~cosicart/pdf/AB-9601/AB-9601.pdf > > >Regards (and a merry chrismas to all of you) >Christian > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 10:03:10 UTC