W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > December 2001

Re: Reference to RIPEMD-160

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:00:27 -0500
Message-Id: <200112211500.KAA0000062779@torque.pothole.com>
To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Given the way URLs go bad with time, I'd be inclined to include both
references.

Thanks,
Donald

From:  Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
Date:  Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:28:22 +0100
To:  reagle@w3.org
Cc:  xml-encryption@w3.org
Message-id:  <3911755209.1008934102@localhost>

>Hi Joseph,
>
>in the References section of [1] I saw that the RIPEMD-160 description was 
>at RSA?
>
>RIPEMD-160
>CryptoBytes, Volume 3, Number 2. The Cryptographic Hash Function 
>RIPEMD-160. RSA Laboratories. Autumn 1997.
>ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/cryptobytes/crypto3n2.pdf
>
>I think that the normative spec for this should be
>
>RIPEMD-160:
>A Strengthened Version of RIPEMD
>Hans Dobbertin, Antoon Bosselaers, Bart Preneel,
>April 1996
>http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~cosicart/pdf/AB-9601/AB-9601.pdf
>
>
>Regards (and a merry chrismas to all of you)
>Christian
>
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 10:03:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:06 UTC