- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:31:49 -0400
- To: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
DATE AND TIME
Monday, 13:00 EST (1pm) 23-Apr-01.
Call Tobin bridge (+1-617-252-7000)
BACKGROUND
The Overview URL for this group is at:
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
NEWS
- I hope the Requirements document will be published on Firday.
AGENDA
- schema re-use: any look on getting schema experts to comment?
- thoughts on rewritten section 2?
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/04/06-proposal.html#sec-Overview
- algorithm progress?
- Takeshi: Does this mean the KeyRetrievalMethod element must not occur
within the KeyInfo element of an EncryptedKey element?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Apr/0011.html
-Takeshi: Does CipherData include CryptoBinary or a set of Transforms?
Reagle: We probably need a new element, what should we call it?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Apr/0016.html
- NameKey, should we think of a better name?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Apr/0005.html
- Processing Model
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/04/06-proposal.html#sec-Processing-XML
- Can we move away from KeyRetrievalMethod, and just use dsig's
retrievalMethod with a particular type?
__
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2001 12:32:02 UTC