Re: Response to CMSMcQ's comments on "Associating Schemas with XML documents", Issues 1, 2, and 5

On 17 Mar 2010, at 08:22 , Grosso, Paul wrote:

> Michael,
>
> On 2010 Feb 10, Jirka Kosek forwarded with your permission
> some email from you to the XML Core mailing list at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Feb/0008
> (member-only) giving some comments you had on our
> "Associating Schemas with XML documents" draft WG Note.
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> We have recorded your issues in our Disposition of Comments at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/02/xml-model-comments.html
> as Issue-1, Issue-2, and Issue-5.
>
> We have incorporated your feedback in our latest (2010 March 15)
> draft at http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/
>
> Specifically, we have addressed Issue-1 at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/#ednote1a and
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/#ednote1b
> Issue-2 at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/#ednote2a and
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/#ednote2b
> and Issue-5 at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/#ednote5
>
> Please let us know (preferably cc-ing xml-editor@w3.org)
> if you are satisfied with how the latest draft addresses
> your comments.

Thank you.  These changes appear to me to address in a
satisfactory way the issues I raised.  Good luck with the
spec.

Michael Sperberg-McQueen

-- 
****************************************************************
* C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC
* http://www.blackmesatech.com
* http://cmsmcq.com/mib
* http://balisage.net
****************************************************************

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 00:54:23 UTC