- From: Colin Adams <colinpauladams@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:27:26 +0100
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: xml-editor@w3.org
No, it doesn't satisfy me. It is a straight attempt to re-write history. And as such no W3C recommendation will be worth anything if it is allowed to pass. 2008/10/3 Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The XML Core WG has responded recently [1] [2] to the two comments you > endorsed. > > As regards the version number point, the evidence cited in [1] and [2] > - From the implementor community is more encouraging than your > prediction, and I hope the Eiffel community will follow their example > if the 5th edition does indeed go forward. > > Please let us know if you are satisfied with our response. > > ht > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0002.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0003.html > - -- > Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh > Half-time member of W3C Team > 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFI5fFskjnJixAXWBoRAjDdAKCBLH4lz1k/l23C5jeApH2cYdbuTgCdF+uJ > xvdbsfAMfVdlPrFwKsbVPac= > =S+rO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 10:28:01 UTC