- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:05:34 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: xml-editor@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The XML Core WG has responded recently [1] [2] to the two comments you
endorsed.
As regards other specs. which reference XML 1.0, either they
referenced a dated version, in which case a new edition will not
affect them, or they referenced the undated version, in which case
they commited themselves to track changes made, and as discussed in
[2], such changes _may_ involve changes to conformance.
Please let us know if you are satisfied with our response.
ht
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0002.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0003.html
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFI5e5ukjnJixAXWBoRAgTUAJkBIroWB6Yg/ZCbuE/YeDJYd390YwCfeZ5C
qo1yihGYt9xtml+G08HuHSk=
=LXcu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 10:06:22 UTC