- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:58:26 +0100
- To: Joe Kesselman <keshlam@alum.mit.edu>
- Cc: xml-editor@w3.org, keshlam-nospam@comcast.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joe Kesselman writes: > It seems we've gotten out of the habit of including a rationalle > section for errata entries. May I suggest that someone go back and add > one to E09 and later? Thanks for the suggestion, don't know why we slipped up on that, rationales now supplied for E09, E10 and E11 - - see http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-4e-errata.html ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFI454ikjnJixAXWBoRAglwAJ0SaYT7j9WQVNNrbEf29ptD97p3CACfcfb9 PQd629w3W8Mj/mCRSOz3lYY= =9vOE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:00:12 UTC