Re: Errata E57

Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
 >The new third edition of XML inspired me to read through the latest
 >errata. I have a problem with one of them that I think is a
 >substantial and unnecessary change to the definition of XML.
 >
 >E57 states:
[rest elided, see 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2003OctDec/0023.html]

The XML Core WG has considered your comment on the XML 1.0 3rd edition 
PER.  We have consensus not to rescind E57, feeling that the E57 status 
quo is the least evil of the choices.

Regards,

-- 
François Yergeau

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2004 15:15:48 UTC