- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 21:34:32 +0900
- To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@topologi.com>, <w3c-xml-plenary@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: <xml-editor@w3.org>, <w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
At 17:03 02/08/03 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote: >But let me step back, and suggest that there is a deeper issue here, >providing a solution to which would help XML users and vendors. > >The scoping of the effect of attributes, whether W3C-defined or user-defined, >should have a systematic solution. Addressing it piecemeal in this fashion >just creates a spaghetti of special cases: namespaces, xml:lang, xml:space, >xml:base, etc. Point taken. But I think part of moving in this direction is the realization that if you combine attribute inheritance and the idea of 'cut-and-paste' of XML elements, then you need a special attribute value that represents the same thing as the absence of the attribute. We are just working now on fixing this for xml:lang. A systematic solution would then make it possible to define attributes as inherited, AND to give their 'NIL' (or whatever we call it) value. Regards, Martin.
Received on Sunday, 4 August 2002 08:56:15 UTC