- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 08:41:36 -0400 (EDT)
- To: michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com
- Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com ('John Cowan'), xml-dev@lists.xml.org, xml-editor@w3.org
Michael Kay scripsit:
> The process should not be used in a way that makes parsers that are
> unambiguously conformant with the original specification suddenly become
> non-conformant, and that forces new releases of those parsers to reject
> documents that they previously accepted.
Well, does anyone know of documents that actually do this, or parsers
that actually accept such hypothetical documents?
--
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
Received on Monday, 22 July 2002 08:43:58 UTC