- From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@elcel.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:38:02 +0100
- To: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
- Cc: <public-xml-testsuite@w3.org>, <xml-editor@w3.org>
Karl Waclawek wrote > > > > I presume that the WFC should take precedence over the VC and, for clarity, > > the VC should therefore be removed. Do you agree? > > Maybe there is a slight difference. > > <snip/> > > It seems, that in the WFC, if standalone="yes", but the reference is > inside a PE in the internal subset, then there is no requirement for > a matching entity declaration at all. I.e. it says nothing about > such references pointing to an external declaration. > > I would say then that the VC: Standalone Document Declaration adds > some extra constraint and is not totally redundant. > > But that is my personal interpretation. > Thanks Karl, but even after your explanation I'm unclear about what situations would generate a VC: Standalone Document but not a WFC: Entity Declared. Perhaps you give a little example of a standalone document that you think has these attributes? Many thanks Rob Lugt
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 17:32:32 UTC