- From: <zongaro@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 12:37:55 -0400
- To: xml-editors@w3.org
- Cc: lehors@us.ibm.com
Hello, I was just looking at the description of xml:space in section 2.10 of XML 1.0 [1]. It says that if the xml:space attribute is declared, it must be declared "as an enumerated type whose values are one or both of "default" and "preserve"." However, it doesn't indicate that other values for the attribute are not permitted if the attribute is not declared, nor does it assign a meaning to such values. In the following document the "declared intent" for the content of the root element is that the default white-space processing mode of the application is acceptable. Section 2.10 further says that the "declared intent is considered to apply to all elements in the content of the element where it is specified, unless overridden with another instance of the xml:space attribute." <root xml:space='preserve'> <child xml:space='xyzzy'> </child> <child xml:space='default'> </child> </root> Clearly the xml:space attribute on the second child element overrides the declared intent of root, but what about the first child element? Does that value (xyzzy) signal no intention for application space handling in the first child, meaning that neither default nor preserve is in effect for the first child element, or does it fail to override the intent of root? Does anybody know whether it was intended that xml:space could have arbitrary values if it's not declared? A second question: the penultimate paragraph of section 2.10 states, in part, that "The value "default" signals that applications' default white-space processing modes are acceptable for this element; the value "preserve" indicates the intent that applications preserve all the white space," while the last paragraph of section 2.10, indicates that "The root element of any document is considered to have signaled no intentions as regards application space handling, unless it provides a value for this attribute or the attribute is declared with a default value." Is signaling no intention the same as signaling the default white-space processing mode is acceptable? In other words, are there three signals or only two? If there are three, why is signaling 'default' not the default? If there are only two, why is one of the signals described in two different ways, i.e., as signaling the default is acceptable and as signaling no intention? Thanks, Henry [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#sec-white-space ------------------------------------------------------------------ Henry Zongaro Xalan development IBM SWS Toronto Lab Tie Line 969-6044; Phone (905) 413-6044 mailto:zongaro@ca.ibm.com
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 12:38:52 UTC