- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:31:13 -0700
- To: xml-editor@w3.org
In section 6 Notation, the spec states: [ wfc: ... ] well-formedness constraint; this identifies by name a constraint on well-formed documents associated with a production. [ vc: ... ] validity constraint; this identifies by name a constraint on valid documents associated with a production In fact, what's actually used in the spec is [ WFC: ... ] and [ VC: ...] in caps. I doubt this will cause major problems for anyone, but it would be nice to make the spec consisitent here. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Java I/O (O'Reilly & Associates, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/books/javaio/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1565924851/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Friday, 13 October 2000 11:36:58 UTC