- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2000 12:14:25 +0700
- To: xml-editor@w3.org
I don't think you've solved what was originally E71 and became PE2. See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2000/01/proposed-xml10-errata.html#PE2 See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2000JanMar/0104.html You've done 2) in Francois' suggested solution, but not 1). I still think my original suggested solution is superior. James
Received on Saturday, 9 September 2000 01:14:02 UTC