- From: MURATA Makoto <muraw3c@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 23:38:29 +0900
- To: xml-editor@w3.org
- Cc: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, muraw3c@attglobal.net
> >Your expertise is required! Richard Tobin and I have been discussing a >possible erratum to erratum E24 >(http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata#E24). You can find the thread on >the xml-editor list starting at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/xml-editor/2000JanMar/0016.html. > >We have clarified a few things, but the question now is why do we want to >add "(including a document entity)" to the third bullet? I recall that you >asked for that in a message to XML-Core. I was convinced then but now I'm >puzzled. Can you please enlighten us? E24 is based on Michael's proposed text [0]. However, he further wrote: >I haven't the foggiest idea why the text specifies > entity replacements but not the document entity itself. I pointed out this issue and (probably mistakenly) suggested "(including a document entity)" [1]. I now think that we should drop the third bullet and add "for every external parsed entity and the literal entity value of every internal parsed entity " after "but after the end-of-line normalization described in section 2.11 has been performed". [0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-syntax-wg/1999Feb/0117.html [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/1999OctDec/0033.html ---- MURATA Makoto muraw3c@attglobal.net
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2000 09:37:57 UTC