- From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 12:44:40 GMT
- To: "Fran?ois Yergeau" <yergeau@alis.com>, "'Richard Tobin'" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <xml-editor@w3.org>
Ok, I understand your points. But now I wonder what the point of adding the phrase "after the end-of-line-normalisation..." was in erratum E24. Would it perhaps be better to remove that phrase, and instead add a note to bullet point three saying that it is the same process of line-end normalisation that is referred to in 2.11, and can therefore be achieved by the same pre-processing suggested in 2.11. That is, a processor which follows the suggestion in 2.11 and normalises line breaks on input before parsing does not have to (and must not) do anything further to fulfill bullet point three. -- Richard
Received on Friday, 11 February 2000 07:46:02 UTC