- From: <mfinney@lynchburg.net>
- Date: 10 Feb 2000 20:34:37 GMT
- To: xml-editor@w3.org
I would like to request a clarification on the grammar for CDATA secion. Production [20] states... [20] CData ::= (Char* - (Char* ']]>' Char*)) which would imply that characters which do not meed the Char [2] production are not allowed in CDATA sections. Further, section 2.11 states... To simplify the tasks of applications, wherever an external parsed entity or the literal entity value of an internal parsed entity contains either the literal two-character sequence "#xD#xA" or a standalone literal #xD, an XML processor must pass to the application the single character #xA. (This behavior can conveniently be produced by normalizing all line breaks to #xA on input, before parsing.) This implies that the new-line processing takes place in the CDATA sections because of the last sentence. However, Tim Bray states in his annotation to XML... When you look at CDATA, you might get the impression that you could maybe jam your binary data in a CDATA section. You'd be right, but you'd have to guarantee that it never included a byte sequence that looks like ]]>. which would be incorrect if either only Char data is allowed or if new-line processing does takes place as described. Is it the intention that either restriction apply to CDATA sections? Or any other restriction that would prevent binary data (other than ]]>) from being represented in CDATA sections? Thank you. Michael Lee Finney michael.finney@acm.org michael.finney@computer.org
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2000 15:34:37 UTC