- From: (wrong string) çois Yergeau <yergeau@alis.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 10:46:40 -0400
- To: <schererm@us.ibm.com>, <xml-editor@w3.org>
- Cc: <mpogue@us.ibm.com>
Markus Scherer wrote: > often times, when one erratum obsoletes another one, the > older one gets an > "Obsoleted by xyz". At least two of those seem to be missing: > E37: Obsoleted by E67 > E1: Obsoleted by E44 Thanks, that's fixed. > This really helps navigating the errata. That's the point! > Also, E44 should have similar font settings as the part of > Annex F that it > replaces: Only the byte sequences should be monospaced, the > explanatory > text should be in the default style (proportional). Yes, but see below. > Is there any plan for a consolidated XML TR that has all of the errata > merged into it? When will this happen? It's very clear that a revised spec is needed, so much so that an effort is underway to do just that. ETA is a few weeks, where "few" is, unfortunately, a bit vague. The revised spec will have correct formatting of Appendix F. Regards, -- François Yergeau
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2000 10:51:53 UTC