- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:44:02 +0200
- To: "Rick JELLIFFE" <ricko@geotempo.com>, <xml-editor@w3.org>, <xml-dev@xml.org>
> Instead, I would propose another level of validity "character validity" > which XML processors should be encouraged, but not required, to support, > or to support as much as they can. Unlike validity, which sits on top > of well-formedness, "character validity" sits more-or-less underneath > well-formedness as XML's soft underbelly. AAck!! NO!! Unneeded complexity, leading to interop bugs. - Dave
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2000 09:42:56 UTC