- From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 03:16:23 +0800 (CST)
- To: xml-editor@w3.org
- cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, MURATA Makoto wrote: > When the charset parameter is not available, the XML processor has to > examine encoding declarations such that each character in > the encoding declarations are represented by two octets. Then, other > encodings such as Extended_UNIX_Code_Fixed_Width_for_Japanese will > be allowed. Of course, EUC fixed is allowed by XML at the moment. The idea, that some people may get, that Appendix F somehow defines the encoding detection routines rather than merely giving a nice start is why I would prefer, for example, the title of Appendix F to be "Example of Encoding-Determining Method for XML" or something similar. And why I think all talk of "this algorthm" should be carefully limited to something like "this example algorithm". Rick Jelliffe
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2000 15:16:35 UTC