Re: Omission in XML 1.0 AttValue syntax definition

At 12:20 AM 8/28/99 -0700, Bengt Richter wrote:
>	Or am I dreaming? Certainly this omission would seem
>to exclude a large class of useful, concise, and easy to read
>expressions.
>
>	If this omission really was intentional, how might this
>be amended in the next revision?

The omission is intentional - requiring that attribute values be quoted
substantially simplifies the implementation of parsers.  -Tim

Received on Saturday, 28 August 1999 11:55:22 UTC