- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 17:20:14 -0400
- To: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com>
- CC: C M Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@uic.edu>, xml-editor@w3.org
Chris Newman wrote:
> Because text/enriched went through a public review process in the IETF,
> this problem was identified and eliminated before it was published. Shame
> that XML lacked a similar public review process.
Hello? XML has been in public review since Nov '97:
Previous versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-961114
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-lang-970331
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-lang-970630
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-970807
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-971117
For an (incomplete) list of public discussion forums
and archive, please see:
http://www.w3.org/XML/#discussion
--
Dan Connolly
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 19 June 1998 17:10:19 UTC