Re: Status and links to Part 3

Looks like we're back on track and ready to roll.  Thanks, Dave.

I'm perfectly happy with the [1] and [2] being the base version.  The
rewrites [3] and [4] exist in the interest of putting forth definite
text to discuss.  I would say that [3] is pretty much obsoleted by [4],
but that the comments that led to [3] are still valid (if a bit sharply
worded at times).

As usual, I'm much more concerned about simple and pertinent questions
having crisp answers than exactly how we phrase or format those
answers.  In that vein, I'm not at all satisfied we have crisp answers
yet (i.e., in the current base), but I'm confident that we can get there
reasonably quickly.

David Orchard wrote:

> I've updated soap12 part3 [1] - first described at [2] - and checked
> the files into cvs.  I did one small editorial change as suggested by
> NM, which was to move the abnormal operation material a little lower. 
> I think a bit more wordsmithing is in order for that section as it now
> seems to read a bit redundant to me.
>
>  
>
> David Hull had a large number of substantial comments, suggestions,
> and rewrites such as [3], [4].  However, it's not clear to me if these
> are still held to or not.
>
>  
>
> From an editorial perspective, I think we are up to date on the
> drafts.  My work here is done.  The WG can always instruct me to make
> subsequent changes to the docs.
>
>  
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>  
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/6/soap12-part3
>
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jun/0000.html
>
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Apr/0020.html
>
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jun/0004.html
>
>  
>
> Ps. This is my 5th set of activity in w3c cvs this week.  Previous
> items: TAG versioning finding, TAG minutes, ws-policy edits, xml
> schema 1.1 versioning guide.  When it rains, it pours!
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>