- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:06:26 -0400
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Certainly looks better. I think it's OK functionally too, but we should
check whether anyone was particularly anxious to have it there. I don't
remember how it got there in the first place. So, fine with me of nobody
else objects. The print preview in Firefox is still dog-ugly, but at
least it doesn't spill off the page, and all the information is now there.
So, I think I'd leave it. All set. Thanks.
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
08/09/2006 04:28 PM
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Status and links to Part 3
The table seems better with the FailureReason property removed. Let me
know if you think this is still a problem.
Cheers,
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:35 AM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Status and links to Part 3
>
> Following up on my own note, it occurs to me that you might want to
make
> the compromise of splitting some of the URIs with a line break after
one
> of the "/". I hadn't noticed that one reason for the unduly wide
column
> was that some of the URIS are exceptionally long. I suppose one could
> also try to not restate the common: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap ,
but I
> suppose it would be hard to do that cleanly. One way or the other, I
> think the table will look pretty bad unless you find a way to narrow
the
> URI column some. Just my opinion.
>
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 23:06:39 UTC