- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:06:26 -0400
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Certainly looks better. I think it's OK functionally too, but we should check whether anyone was particularly anxious to have it there. I don't remember how it got there in the first place. So, fine with me of nobody else objects. The print preview in Firefox is still dog-ugly, but at least it doesn't spill off the page, and all the information is now there. So, I think I'd leave it. All set. Thanks. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> 08/09/2006 04:28 PM To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Subject: RE: Status and links to Part 3 The table seems better with the FailureReason property removed. Let me know if you think this is still a problem. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:35 AM > To: David Orchard > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: RE: Status and links to Part 3 > > Following up on my own note, it occurs to me that you might want to make > the compromise of splitting some of the URIs with a line break after one > of the "/". I hadn't noticed that one reason for the unduly wide column > was that some of the URIS are exceptionally long. I suppose one could > also try to not restate the common: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap , but I > suppose it would be hard to do that cleanly. One way or the other, I > think the table will look pretty bad unless you find a way to narrow the > URI column some. Just my opinion. > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 23:06:39 UTC