Errata and current status of ed drafts

I took an AI during last week's call to go through the errata and see 
which ones have been folded into the editors' drafts (was supposed to do 
this on friday, but could not :-( ).

I tried to look at issues that affected part 0, part 1, test collection, 
xop, mtom, rrshb and avoided part 2 (except where noted). The list below 
covers about half the issues in the errata list.

I found errata issues against part 0 whose resolutions have not been 
included in WWW/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/. Is this the right place to look 
for the latest draft of part 0 in CVS? I know this is the right place 
for part 1, part 2 and test collection. It seems like part 0 does not 
use the xml/xsl files. Is that correct? Should I make those changes 
directly in HTML?

I also found errata issues against the schema whose resolutions have not 
been included in WWW/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/. Is this the right place to 
look for the latest schema in CVS?


2rec -- done (all the specs): fixed copyright notice
3rec -- done (part 1)
4rec -- done (part 0)
5rec -- fixed in the 1st occurance but not in the second occurance of 
reference for part 0 (part 1)
6rec -- done (test collection)
7rec -- done (test collection)
8rec -- done (test collection)
9rec -- done (part 1)
12rec -- done (part 1)
13rec -- 3rd item not done, rest are done (part 0)
15rec -- not done (soap-envelope.xsd schema)
16rec -- not done (soap-rpc.xsd schema)
17rec -- change of soap11 link and change of status (various specs)
18rec -- not done (schema)
19rec -- done (test collection)
23rec -- done (test collection)
24rec -- done (part 0)
29rec -- done (RRSHB)
30rec -- done (test collection)
31rec -- done (part 1)
32rec -- not done (part 0)
37rec -- done (test collection), should be closed in the issue list
38rec -- done (test collection)

-Anish
--

Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2006 06:59:38 UTC