Re: Issue 455 resolution text

For the record, this was Anish's proposal and I forwarded it.  We have 
agreed a different resolution at the F2F, and it does not use "none".  I 
suspect you will find it acceptable, but I don't have the exact text here. 
 Thanks.

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Sent by: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM
03/02/2004 09:04 AM

 
        To:     noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
        cc:     xml-dist-app@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: Issue 455 resolution text


On Mar 2, 2004, at 4:45 AM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> Issue resolution:
> "If the sender wants a representation header to survive processing at
> SOAP intermediaries (and reach the ultimate destination), it may use 
> the
> SOAP role of 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'. The
> document that specifies the representation header will include text 
> that
> specifies what a SOAP node must do when processing the representation
> header with a role of 
> 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'."
>
This seems quite wrong to me. Special casing the use of 'none' for the 
Representation header goes against the SOAP processing model - use of 
'none' requests that the header block isn't processed by 
intermediaries. The Representation header should follow normal SOAP 
processing rules. I'm opposed to this resolution.

Marc.

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Web Products, Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.

Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2004 10:07:18 UTC