- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:17:58 -0700
- To: "Aleksander Slominski" <aslom@cs.indiana.edu>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Per the W3C process the implementation stage is Candidate Recommendation ( 2 stages on from where the specs are currently ). A spec cannot successfully progress from Candidate Recommendation without demonstration of interoperable implementations. So before we're done, there will be implementations that interoperate. BTW, the latest editors drafts of XOP/MTOM no longer have any dependency on XML Query. Hence the next public versions of the documents will also not have that dependancy. Regards Martin Gudgin > -----Original Message----- > From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org > [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Aleksander Slominski > Sent: 07 June 2004 17:09 > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: MTOM/XOP implementations/prototypes and use cases? > > > hi, > > are there available any (open source?) > implementations/prototypes that > validate proposed spec practicality (casual googling did not > find any)? > > isnt it important to follow IETF model for more than one proof of > concept implementation or is it too early at this stage? > > what is the current timeline for XOP/MTOM? > > did anybody try to set some use case and test interoperability? > > it seems that since conception of initial idea the > description becomes > more and more formal/complex/harder to read (like dependency on XML > Query model which depends on PSVI from XML Schemas ...). > > thanks, > > alek > >
Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 12:18:24 UTC