RE: Concrete packaging spec

Hi Jeff,
 
This looks great. Finally something to hold on to.
Do you have any idea when will this proposal move forward ?
 
I am currently in the begging of the process of defining the standards for
an integration project for one of our customers.
The general giudeline for my work is to use the GXA specs, and the reason I
feel we might need something like WS-Attachments is for passing small, non
XML, text data in the body of the SOAP message.
 
The people form Microsoft in Israel are urging me to implement
WS-Attachment. They are saying that the expiry date is irrelevant, and that
WS-Attachments is a standard that is already implemented by Microsoft and
IBM.
That is why it is important for me to understand the timeline and commitment
to the old and new standards.
 
Thanks,
Eliezer
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer [mailto:jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 5:48 PM
To: Eliezer Birinbom
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: RE: Concrete packaging spec



You may wish to review a recent proposal to the W3C XML Protocol WG:

http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa61.html
<http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa61.html> 

 

--Jeff

 


  _____  


From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Eliezer Birinbom
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 1:21 PM
Subject: Concrete packaging spec

 

Hi,

 

Considering the fact that both DIME and WS-Attachments have expired on
December 2002, what active standard can we use ?

Has anyone picked up the glove and made progress with this issue ?

 

Thanks,

Eliezer Birinbom

Lab Manager @ matrix-IT

eliezerb@matrix.co.il <mailto:eliezerb@matrix.co.il>