- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 11:02:08 -0400
- To: John Kemp <john.kemp@earthlink.net>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
John Kemp asks: >> May I ask why you would preclude use of 1.1 envelopes? I think there are two legitimate answers to this. The somewhat fascecious and negative answer would be: a) For the same reason you don't allow an image/gif to contain an image/jpeg stream, even if that's what the server prefers to send back. You COULD define image/gif to allow both, but it would reduce the utility of the media type as a negotation and dispatch mechanism. For the same reason, the application/soap+xml (which might better be named application/soap12+xml) is defined to rather strictly accept one format. or the more liberal: b) The media type isn't going to be completely useful in negotiating interop at the soap level. The media type definition is changed to include both forms of a soap request, and you have to look at the root qname to see which you've got. I think my preference is for (a), particularly since SOAP 1.1 (for better or worse) encouraged text/xml anyway. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 11:11:26 UTC