Re: New PR issue: one or more ultimate receiver?

+1 too, but I don't think this was the point of my original note, as was 
reiterated here[1].

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Jun/0044.html

Mark Baker wrote:

> Yep, +1. I was just going to point out the same thing using
> load balancing as an example.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:02:53PM -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
>>I believe we are quite clear that SOAP says 
>>nothing about whether the implementation of a SOAP node such as the 
>>endpoint is distributed or replicated.
> 
> 
> MB

Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 07:50:56 UTC