- From: Don Box <dbox@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:17:06 -0800
- To: "John J. Barton" <John_Barton@hpl.hp.com>, "Ray Whitmer" <rayw@netscape.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: John J. Barton [mailto:John_Barton@hpl.hp.com] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:01 AM > To: Ray Whitmer > Cc: Don Box; xml-dist-app@w3.org > > Ray, > > Sorry I wasn't clear. I certainly don't believe that XML needs to > do anything about a universal object model. I was only agreeing with > Box et al that mechanisms to work with a mixture of XML and binary > are not limited to SOAP. I couldn't agree more. > If I am an application writer and I am writing code to traverse > through the > data structure returned by parsing XML, then I will encounter some > references to non-XML data. Surely this must be true! It happens for > HTML all the time, with references to GIF and JPEG. I don't know how > XML's > open nature could be violated by referencing non-XML data. And if the > tools > cannot handle references to binary then what are they good for? > > We should have a standard that allows a sender to combine XML with some > non-XML data in a way that a receiver can parse the XML and access the > non-XML data. It shouldn't matter if the XML is SOAP or not. +1! DB
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 13:17:39 UTC