- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:03:35 -0800
- To: "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
- Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Section 2.7.4[1] states "All XML infoset properties of a message MUST be preserved with the following exceptions" Given that ns prefixes are properties of element information items ( for better or worse ), they have to be preserved. Gudge [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-soap12-part1-20021219/#soapinterminfoset > -----Original Message----- > From: David Fallside [mailto:fallside@us.ibm.com] > Sent: 07 February 2003 17:56 > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org > Subject: treatment of ns prefixes by intermediaries > > > > > > > > This question came up during an implementer's interop test > session: Is an intermediary obliged to preserve namespace > prefixes? The spec says nothing explicitly (that we could > find) but appears to implicitly oblige intermediaries to > preserve them. What did the WG intend? > > > ............................................ > David C. Fallside, IBM > Ext Ph: 530.477.7169 > Int Ph: 544.9665 > fallside@us.ibm.com > >
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 14:03:55 UTC