- From: Bob Cunnings <cunnings@lectrosonics.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:50:14 -0700
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
This may be of interest: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Sep/0187.html Since the SOAP envelope is in theory regenerated at each hop in a message path then does it make sense for the Envelope namespace prefix to be preserved since it is a new message each time? RC > > > This question came up during an implementer's interop test session: Is an > > intermediary obliged to preserve namespace prefixes? The spec says nothing > > explicitly (that we could find) but appears to implicitly oblige > > intermediaries to preserve them. What did the WG intend? > > Since [prefix] is an EII I would assume it's preserved. > > If not, then signatures break. > /r$
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 13:50:45 UTC